BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Authors Evaluation
Chen L, Song HC, Meng FZ, Zhang SY, An ZY, Ling XY, Zhang C, Zhu XC, Wang JZ, Song RP, Liu LX. Impact of textbook outcome after hepatectomy for colorectal metastases on salvage curative-intent treatment at recurrence. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(7): 120704 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i7.120704]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
We greatly appreciate the editorial team’s dedicated work and professional support throughout the manuscript handling, peer-review, revision, and publication processes. We are also deeply grateful to the reviewers for their careful evaluation of our manuscript and for providing insightful, constructive, and professional comments. These valuable suggestions helped us further improve the scientific quality, rigor, clarity, and readability of the article.The successful publication of our work would not have been possible without the efficient and rigorous efforts of the editorial team and the objective and expert guidance of the reviewers. We have benefited greatly from the entire submission and revision process, which has also provided valuable inspiration for our future research.Once again, we sincerely thank the editorial team and the reviewers for their time, effort, and professional contributions. We wish the journal continued success and an ever-growing academic impact.